Tuesday, September 2, 2014
newyorkcityfeelings:

Empire State Building in RED

newyorkcityfeelings:

Empire State Building in RED

(Source: little-expectation)

sexybaldwin:

How Cecil thinks Carlos does science:image

How Carlos actually does science:

image

comedyaintpretty:

One of the best ending moments in a movie.

thedemon-hauntedworld:

NGC 5806
Credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA

(Source: samdesantis)

(Source: haemus)

journolist:

Washington Post editorials will no longer use ‘Redskins’ for the local NFL team 

This page has for many years urged the local football team to change its name. The term “Redskins,” we wrote in 1992, “is really pretty offensive.” The team owner then, Jack Kent Cooke, disagreed, and the owner now, Daniel M. Snyder, disagrees, too. But the matter seems clearer to us now than ever, and while we wait for the National Football League to catch up with thoughtful opinion and common decency, we have decided that, except when it is essential for clarity or effect, we will no longer use the slur ourselves. That’s the standard we apply to all offensive vocabulary, and the team name unquestionably offends not only many Native Americans but many other Americans, too.

Read more here. 
After Challenge From Olbermann, ESPN Says Announcers Don’t Have To Say ‘Redskins’ On Air

ESPN announced Saturday that it would give its on-air broadcasters, analysts, and personalities the option to avoid saying the name of Washington’s professional football team, a day after the Washington Post editorial board joined the list of publications that will no longer print the name and ESPN’s Keith Olbermann used his show to call on the network to institute such a policy.
“Our consistent company policy will continue: using official names and marks as presented by the teams, leagues and conferences we cover,” ESPN said in a statement. “We do, however, recognize the debate over the use of ‘Washington Redskins’ and have afforded individuals the opportunity to decide how they will use those words when reporting on the team.”

Read more here. 

journolist:

Washington Post editorials will no longer use ‘Redskins’ for the local NFL team 

This page has for many years urged the local football team to change its name. The term “Redskins,” we wrote in 1992, “is really pretty offensive.” The team owner then, Jack Kent Cooke, disagreed, and the owner now, Daniel M. Snyder, disagrees, too. But the matter seems clearer to us now than ever, and while we wait for the National Football League to catch up with thoughtful opinion and common decency, we have decided that, except when it is essential for clarity or effect, we will no longer use the slur ourselves. That’s the standard we apply to all offensive vocabulary, and the team name unquestionably offends not only many Native Americans but many other Americans, too.

Read more here

After Challenge From Olbermann, ESPN Says Announcers Don’t Have To Say ‘Redskins’ On Air

ESPN announced Saturday that it would give its on-air broadcasters, analysts, and personalities the option to avoid saying the name of Washington’s professional football team, a day after the Washington Post editorial board joined the list of publications that will no longer print the name and ESPN’s Keith Olbermann used his show to call on the network to institute such a policy.

“Our consistent company policy will continue: using official names and marks as presented by the teams, leagues and conferences we cover,” ESPN said in a statement. “We do, however, recognize the debate over the use of ‘Washington Redskins’ and have afforded individuals the opportunity to decide how they will use those words when reporting on the team.”

Read more here

(Source: candle-lighted)